INDIANAPOLIS -- Nate Fowler scored 17 points and Butler dominated nearly every aspect of the game in a 91-55 win over Norfolk S

Posted in IYH Forums by jokergreen0220 at 11:43, Feb 18 2020

INDIANAPOLIS -- Nate Fowler scored 17 points and Butler dominated nearly every aspect of the game in a 91-55 win over Norfolk State in a Las Vegas Invitational campus game on Monday night.The remainder of the tournament will shift to Las Vegas for the final two rounds on Thursday and Friday.Fowler finished an economical 6 of 7 from the field and grabbed a team-best seven rebounds. Avery Woodson finished with 15 points for the Bulldogs (4-0), who shot 58.2 percent to the Spartans 31.4 percent. Butler also held a 35-28 lead on the glass and a 26-8 advantage in assists.Jonathan Wade and Micah Goss each had 13 points to lead Norfolk State (2-3).Butler outscored the Spartans 36-12 over the final 10:56 of the first half for a 50-24 halftime lead. A Fowler 3 with 13:58 left pushed the lead to 66-26 and Butler cruised from there. https://www.packersrookiestore.com/Packers-Marcedes-Lewis-Jersey/" class="TyTxtSmlC">Marcedes Lewis Super Bowl Jersey . 1 position. The Mustangs (6-0), who beat Queens 50-31 last weekend, earned 17 first-place votes and 287 points in voting by the Football Reporters of Canada. Western was last ranked first in the country in October 2011. https://www.packersrookiestore.com/Packers-Marquez-Valdes-Scantling-Jersey/" class="TyTxtSmlC">Marquez Valdes-Scantling Super Bowl Jersey . But Bourque, who has missed three games with a lower-body injury, wont be in the lineup when the Habs travel to Buffalo to take on the Sabres on Wednesday. https://www.packersrookiestore.com/Packers-Tramon-Williams-Jersey/" class="TyTxtSmlC">https://www.packersrookiestore.com/Packers-Tramon-Williams-Jersey/ .ca look back at each of the Top 10 stories of 2013. Today, we look back at Boston Strong - a citys recovery from tragedy. https://www.packersrookiestore.com/Packers-Oren-Burks-Jersey/" class="TyTxtSmlC">Oren Burks Super Bowl Jersey . "Were just throwing s--- at the wall hoping something sticks," said Tortorella about the possible line combinations for Fridays game against Columbus. The Canucks have lost five straight games and six of their last seven, leaving them in a logjam in the Pacific Division, currently sitting fifth - good for ninth in the Western Conference. https://www.packersrookiestore.com/Packers-Davante-Adams-Jersey/" class="TyTxtSmlC">Davante Adams Super Bowl Jersey . -- The proud fathers huddled near the Dallas Stars dressing room, smiling, laughing and telling stories while wearing replica green sweaters of their sons team. The Supreme Court has asked the Lodha Committee to re-examine the recommendation relating to the presence of two franchise representatives on the IPL Governing Council. The BCCI had strongly objected to the recommendation, saying that the presence of franchises representatives would amount to conflict of interest as the Governing Council takes influential decisions that directly affect the teams.The BCCI contends that the induction of the nominees from the franchisees is impermissible because important matters like players-retention policy, posting of umpires for IPL matches, etc are deliberated upon and decided by the Governing Council itself, the two-judge bench of the court said in its judgement on Monday, which made it mandatory for the BCCI to implement virtually all the recommendations proposed by the Lodha Committee. There is therefore an evident conflict of interest between the nominees of the IPL franchisees on the one hand and their role as members of the Governing Council on the other.In May, former BCCI president Shashank Manohar had expanded on why the BCCI felt the presence of the franchises nominees on the Governing Council amounted to clear conflict of interest. Manohar pointed out that one big reason the BCCI got itself embroiled in a slew of legal issues was the presence of former BCCI president N Srinivasan, the owner of Chennai Super Kings, on the IPL Governing Council. I should not judge on a matter when I have an interest in it. That is the basic rule of law, Manohar said.Having the franchise nominees on the Governing Council would amount to violating the principles of institutional integrity, the BCCI legal counsel had said during the court hearings.The objective of this particular recommendation, the Lodha committee had said, was to bring more independent voices to the Governing Council. The council, it said, should comprise of nine members: three ex-officio members (the BCCI secretary, treasurer, and the CEO), two representatives of the members of BCCI to be elected by the General Body, ttwo nominees of the franchises, one nominee who is the Comptroller and Auditor Generals representative on the Apex Council (the proposed body that would replace the Working Committee, the BCCIs highest decision-making body), and one nominee from the players association.dddddddddddd It was also recommended that the nominees of the franchises rotate annually.The court pointed out that independent voices was the objective, but contended that the Lodha Committee was not definitive on whether the IPL franchises needed to have a seat on the Governing Council. All that is said is that the Governing Council [so far] has denied any role to the franchisee companies, and that there is no independent voice in the Governing Council which is dominated by the full members of the BCCI and two former cricketers, the court said.The court did concede, however, that there was an element of conflict, as raised by Manohar and BCCI. The Committee does not appear to have addressed the question of conflict of interest in the event IPL franchisees place two nominees in the Governing Council. There is prima facie a possibility of conflict of interest arising out of [this]. Be that as it may, we do not consider it necessary to finally pronounce on this aspect, which can be better left to the Committee to re-examine in the light of what has been observed earlier.The court made it clear that if the Lodha Committee were to rule out the possibility of conflict of interest on re-examing the recommendation, it would accept it. We make it clear that if upon reconsideration of the matter the Committee takes a view that the induction of the nominees of the franchisees will not result in any conflict of interest, it shall be free to stick to its recommendations in which event the recommendations shall be deemed to have been accepted by this Court to be formalised and carried out in such manner as the Committee may decide. ' ' '