Taso The Greek wrote:
the wwe has failed to produce anyone to face Taker so they do HHH/Taker III.... its sad.
Im intersted in the match and to see if Taker ever comes back. The Streak shouldnt end but it shouldnt become a joke either.
I disagree They have people who could face Undertaker. YOu could do Mark Henry again, Dolph Ziggler, Wade Barrett, etc but now everyone wants that big epic match up for Taker and for some reason they assume Triple H is that guy and I really don't think he is.
His point most likely was that wwe have failed to build any of their present stars to the status where there might even be a miniscule chance of taker being defeated. So it kind of defeats the purpose to look forward to the match when you know that there is no chance of taker's streak being in danger. And who wants to see henry-taker. As good as Henry was this past few months, he is still a shitty wrestler. So atleast make an effort to understand what is being posted.
indian dude got it right, XT gets it wrong again... and seriously XT.... Wade Barrett Mark Henry?? evenb Dolph Ziggler has become almost a punchline when you look at everyone on that roster, with very few exceptions, they are all mid-carders. Jack hits the nail on the head. They are all on the same level. and none of them would have a "chance" against Taker.
HHH vs Undertaker- good promo at the end there, but the match itself should have been a retirement match in a Hell in a Cell. there should be clear and defined linnes with this match as it is the only thing in WWE that really has any mre4aning or worrth since all the titles have basically become worthless.